
Statewide Analysis
Home 
II. The Baseline
A Wake-up Call to Rhode Island
For the first time in 1997, RIDE reported state assessment results based on Regents
standards for student performance. These results serve as the baseline against which we
can measure future progress in improving student achievement. The 1997 assessment results,
confirmed by Rhode Islands results on the National Assessment of Educational
Progress (NAEP), serve as a wake-up call to all communities in our state. Our students are
not prepared to be successful in the new economy of the 21st century.
Specifically, these results tell us that:
- Students achievement is largely
predictable by the median income of their communities.
- Students do better in the areas on which
weve historically focused basic skills.
- Students do poorly in the advanced skills
they need now and in the 21st century.
- Even the students in Rhode Islands
highest performing districts are performing poorly relative to our states high
standards.
- There are substantial performance gaps
between different groups of students defined by gender, race and ethnicity and special
needs.
Achievement is Too Easily
Predicted by Income
Chart 1 demonstrates
the strong relationship between median family income and student achievement at the
district level. It graphs median family income against the percentage of students at or
above standard in grade 10 math skills. With some notable exceptions, the two lines track
with one another, trending upward as median income increases. This consistency between
income and achievement has held for at least ten years.
There are Large Gaps in
Student Performance
The 1997 assessment results allow Rhode
Islanders to measure the gaps in student performance that Article 31 seeks to close. These
gaps are of two kinds:
- the gaps between actual student achievement
and the states standards (standards gap),
- the gaps between the achievement of
different groups of students as defined by poverty, gender, race and ethnicity, and
special needs (equity gaps).
Collectively, we must understand the
magnitude and implications of these gaps and work together to close them over time.
GO TO: The Rhode Island Public Educational System At
A Glance (Table 1)
1997 Grade Ten Performance by School: Percent of Test Takers
at or Above Standard (Table 2)
Standard Gaps (Chart 2, Chart 3, Chart 4, Chart 5)
Equity Gaps (Chart 6, Chart 7, Chart 8, Chart 9)
Return to the
Statewide Analysis Home Page || Return to the
Information Works Home Page |